A Bill of Responsibilities
What Oren Lyons says the Bill of Rights Should Have been Called
Oren Lyons, Onondogan Chief and Faithkeeper of the Iroquois Confederacy, aka The Six Nations or Haudenosaunee people of the Northeastern United States, says that it would have been better if the framers of the United States government had called it a Bill of Responsibilities, rather than a Bill of Rights. The Iroquois Confederacy was the model of governance to which the framers of the United States Constitution turned, in seeking to create a balanced representative government. The separation of powers, the balance between Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches, was all modeled on the Confederacy. There were, however, several notable deviations. First, the equivalent of the Supreme Court, in the Iroquois Confederacy, was entirely comprised of women. Second, as Oren Lyons points out in the video above, the purpose of the equivalent of the Bill of Rights, in Iroquois culture, was not to establish rights, which prioritize the individual, but to establish responsibilities, which prioritize the Commons, and articulate our responsibility to care for the future.
Related Practices:
See Hawa'iian Indigenous Traditional Agriculture. See The Unangan Way. See Indigenous Voices.Photography: | Licensed from Pexels.com, used with permission.